Selected Topics by County 2002-2005
| At Risk for Obesity, Oregon, 2002-2005 (Non-age adjusted) |
| Obese: Repondents with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30.0 or above |
| Source: Oregon Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System |
| |
|
95% Confidence |
|
| Males & Females |
PERCENT |
Interval |
Small |
Number |
Interviews |
| 18 years & older |
weighted % |
L. limit % |
U. limit % |
# |
unweighted N |
unweighted N |
| STATEWIDE |
22.1 |
21.6 |
22.7 |
|
8196 |
35681 |
| BAKER |
19.0 |
14.0 |
25.3 |
|
51 |
248 |
| BENTON |
15.2 |
12.8 |
18.0 |
|
176 |
964 |
| CLACKAMAS |
21.1 |
19.4 |
23.0 |
|
706 |
3272 |
| CLATSOP |
26.2 |
21.3 |
31.7 |
|
117 |
447 |
| COLUMBIA |
31.2 |
26.6 |
36.2 |
|
159 |
513 |
| COOS |
23.6 |
20.1 |
27.4 |
|
194 |
786 |
| CROOK |
24.4 |
16.6 |
34.2 |
|
55 |
239 |
| CURRY |
17.3 |
13.0 |
22.6 |
|
55 |
287 |
| DESCHUTES |
18.4 |
16.1 |
21.1 |
|
256 |
1391 |
| DOUGLAS |
26.9 |
23.9 |
30.1 |
|
336 |
1264 |
| GILLIAM/WHEELER |
33.6 |
18.4 |
53.3 |
|
15 |
52 |
| GRANT |
23.2 |
14.8 |
34.5 |
|
26 |
105 |
| HARNEY |
27.4 |
18.9 |
37.9 |
|
32 |
110 |
| HOOD RIVER |
19.6 |
13.2 |
28.2 |
|
38 |
198 |
| JACKSON |
21.1 |
19.0 |
23.5 |
|
442 |
2073 |
| JEFFERSON |
28.9 |
21.9 |
37.2 |
|
53 |
198 |
| JOSEPHINE |
23.6 |
20.3 |
27.3 |
|
205 |
895 |
| KLAMATH |
23.3 |
19.9 |
27.1 |
|
195 |
768 |
| LAKE |
26.0 |
17.8 |
36.3 |
|
33 |
116 |
| LANE |
22.8 |
21.2 |
24.6 |
|
870 |
3585 |
| LINCOLN |
27.0 |
22.6 |
31.9 |
|
137 |
513 |
| LINN |
30.7 |
27.5 |
34.1 |
|
339 |
1142 |
| MALHEUR |
29.7 |
24.0 |
36.1 |
|
95 |
334 |
| MARION |
24.9 |
22.9 |
27.1 |
|
666 |
2564 |
| MORROW |
29.0 |
20.0 |
40.0 |
|
32 |
116 |
| MULTNOMAH |
19.4 |
18.2 |
20.7 |
|
1258 |
6193 |
| POLK |
20.9 |
17.4 |
24.9 |
|
158 |
677 |
| TILLAMOOK |
21.9 |
16.8 |
27.9 |
|
70 |
303 |
| UMATILLA |
26.0 |
22.5 |
29.9 |
|
209 |
753 |
| UNION |
20.3 |
15.6 |
25.9 |
|
71 |
327 |
| WALLOWA |
11.4 |
6.8 |
18.6 |
|
19 |
116 |
| WASCO/SHERMAN |
24.2 |
18.9 |
30.4 |
|
79 |
304 |
| WASHINGTON |
20.3 |
18.8 |
21.9 |
|
831 |
4007 |
| YAMHILL |
26.1 |
22.5 |
30.2 |
|
218 |
821 |
| ** % based on less than 50 respondents may not accurately reflect behavior of the entire county. Data are not reported for counties with less than 10 respondents. |